| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:27:13 +0900 From: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23 Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: > >> Tejun already reported that this apparently gets fixed _properly_ with >> the more extensive cleanups and fixes that are pending for 2.6.25. > > btw., how extensive are those cleanups and fixes in reality, is there a > rollup somewhere one could take a look at? Those fixes and cleanups were > deferred to v2.6.25 in the knowledge of having the current code included > in v2.6.24 - but now that the current approach seems to regress, maybe > those cleanups are still safe enough. (compared to an outright revert) The following git tree contains patches pending review for 2.6.25. http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tj/libata-dev.git;a=shortlog;h=improve-ATAPI-data-transfer-no-pio And we're getting close to fixing the regression. I don't think there's too much worry about this one. Just need a bit more time to test few more things. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists