linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Intel Management Engine Interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:17:58 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>
Cc:	Anas Nashif <nashif@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Intel Management Engine Interface

On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 10:00:24AM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
> Anas Nashif wrote:
> >
> >Actually no TCP/IP is needed here. Basically the MEI driver writes and 
> >reads the
> >messages to/from the firmware. When communicating in-band using LMS, TCP/IP
> >terminates at LMS and the messages are copied using MEI driver.
> >
> >>>To have a feel for all of this, with many examples, samples and 
> >>>documentation
> >>>you can download the AMT 3.0 SDK (google: intel amt sdk).
> >>I would be more interested right now how the kernel can use this without
> >>additional user space support. Any ideas on this? 
> >
> >I will dig for some documents on that.
> ..
> 
> Sample code for storing a trace_back() would be much better.

Better just a patch that handles all oopses or perhaps better
all printk output (meconsole?) 

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/