linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:58:09 -0800
From:	Larry Finger <larry.finger@...inger.net>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC:	Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>, Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>,
	Ray Lee <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>,
	Simon Holm Thøgersen <odie@...aau.dk>,
	matthias.kaehlcke@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux@...mer.net, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	kjwinchester@...il.com, jonathan@...masters.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bcm43xx-dev@...ts.berlios.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semaphore
 to	mutex

Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> Actually, can you explain why, from the technical point of view, the version 4
> firware is better than version 3, please?

I will be very interested in Michael's answer to this question; however, my experience is that it 
doesn't make much difference if your device is supported by both V3 and V4 firmware. This impression 
was obtained by comparing BCM4318 and BCM4311/1 devices with b43 and b43legacy.

Note that 802.11b and early BCM4306 devices are not supported by V4 firmware. Similarly, with 
BCM4311/2 and newer devices V3 firmware fails. As Michael said "newer drivers supporting newer 
hardware need newer firmware".

Larry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/