linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [RFC] be more verbose when probing EDD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:18:49 +0000
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	"Parag Warudkar" <parag.warudkar@...il.com>
Cc:	devzero@....de, Matt.Domsch@...l.com, hpa@...or.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] be more verbose when probing EDD

> Why tax other people with a warning/hang etc. in printk when the
> problem is very unlikely on their systems?

I think there is sense in it if you do it subtly differently.

	printk(".. if this hangs do ... \r");
	edd_stuff();
	printk("                          \r");
	

So that we display it, do the EDD call, then write over it with whatever
is next that matters.

That way you'd only see it when it hung - and that might be worth a patch
and test from someone.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/