linux-kernel - Re: compat_sys_times() bogus until jiffies >= 0.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 22 Dec 2007 02:49:19 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	andi@...stfloor.org, mtk.manpages@...glemail.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, lkml@...idb.org, paulus@...ba.org,
	drepper@...hat.com, cfriesen@...tel.com, schwab@...e.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: compat_sys_times() bogus until jiffies >= 0.

> I'm suggesting that you set the condition codes based upon whether
> there is an error or not. 

And the only way the syscall code could find out if there is an error is by
checking err < 0 && err >= -4096 like glibc (except for the compat
syscall on 64bit kernel case) 

Or rewrite all code that returns errors to system calls to pass
a separate flag too.

> That is the critical thing x86 doesn't do
> that all the other platforms do.

It doesn't do it because it's useless without a kernel rewrite.

I frankly doubt it really works on Sparc :-) Maybe it could work
there on a hypothetical rewritten kernel, but not today.

-Andi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/