| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 03:32:18 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> To: sct@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, adilger@...sterfs.com Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: [2.6.24 patch] let EXT4DEV_FS depend on BROKEN It might make sense to offer ext4 in -mm and even in early -rc kernels, but I've already seen people using ext4 simply because a stable kernel offered it - and that's definitely not intended. Anyone who _really_ wants to test ext4 should anyway be able to do the trivial change of removing the "depends on BROKEN" line. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> --- f778e1d046a3554ca15b8637afd0ffbf4790801c diff --git a/fs/Kconfig b/fs/Kconfig index 487236c..d850725 100644 --- a/fs/Kconfig +++ b/fs/Kconfig @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ config EXT3_FS_SECURITY config EXT4DEV_FS tristate "Ext4dev/ext4 extended fs support development (EXPERIMENTAL)" - depends on EXPERIMENTAL + depends on BROKEN select JBD2 select CRC16 help -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists