linux-kernel - Re: isofs oops - d_splice_alias+0x1f (2.6.24-rc5-mm1)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 3 Jan 2008 14:10:33 +0000
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: isofs oops - d_splice_alias+0x1f (2.6.24-rc5-mm1)

On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 02:23:44PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:

> ISOFS: unable to read i-node block

isofs_read_inode() failing, about to do make_bad_inode()

> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000000ad RIP:
>  [<ffffffff802a679f>] d_splice_alias+0x1f/0x100

struct dentry *d_splice_alias(struct inode *inode, struct dentry *dentry)
{
        struct dentry *new = NULL;

        if (inode && S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
	                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^

> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff802a679f>]  [<ffffffff802a679f>] d_splice_alias+0x1f/0x100
> RSP: 0000:ffff810061543b08  EFLAGS: 00010282
> RAX: 00000000ffffffff RBX: fffffffffffffffb RCX: ffffffff880d3454
> RDX: ffff810048542750 RSI: ffff81005e114e10 RDI: fffffffffffffffb

with inode equal to (struct inode *)-5.  Which is ERR_PTR(-EIO)...

>  [<ffffffff880d2395>] :isofs:isofs_lookup+0x395/0x4a0

        inode = NULL;
        if (found) {
                inode = isofs_iget(dir->i_sb, block, offset);
                if (!inode) {
                        unlock_kernel();
                        return ERR_PTR(-EACCES);
                }
        }
        unlock_kernel();
        return d_splice_alias(inode, dentry);

So we've got ERR_PTR(-EIO) from isofs_iget().  Bloody odd, seeing that
isofs_iget() either explicitly returns NULL or does

        if (inode && (inode->i_state & I_NEW)) {
                sb->s_op->read_inode(inode);
                unlock_new_inode(inode);
        }

        return inode;

which would not manage to return ERR_PTR(-EIO), no matter what - it would
die on access to inode->i_state.  I don't have -mm tree at hand, check if
there's anything affected in these areas.  Perhaps somebody tried to pass
error values from isofs_iget() and forgot to update callers?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/