linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/7] ACPI: Separate disabling of GPEs from

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 3 Jan 2008 18:07:12 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Carlos Corbacho <carlos@...angeworlds.co.uk>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Alexey Starikovskiy <aystarik@...il.com>,
	"Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/7] ACPI: Separate disabling of GPEs from _PTS

On Thursday, 3 of January 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> > 
> > The preparation to enter an ACPI system sleep state is now tied to
> > the disabling of GPEs, but the GPEs should not be disabled before
> > suspending devices.  Since on ACPI 1.0x systems the _PTS global
> > control method should be executed before suspending devices, we
> > need to disable GPEs separately.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> 
> Looks ok to me... as does rest of the series.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/