linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] please pull infiniband.git for-linus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 03 Jan 2008 15:13:07 -0500
From:	David Dillow <dillowda@...l.gov>
To:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, general@...ts.openfabrics.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] please pull infiniband.git for-linus


On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 10:56 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > If we've got time before 2.6.24 final, I'd wait on this a bit.
>  > ib_srp:srp_remove_work() has them reversed as well, and I'm currently
>  > tracking down why it oopses when the srp_remove_host() happens before
>  > the scsi_remove_host(), which is the documented call sequence.
> 
> I think the best thing to do is to merge this (assuming that Linus
> gets to it), since it looks quite safe and definitely fixes a crash.
> Then if we get to the root cause we can change the order of the calls
> if it turns out a different fix is required.

I've made progress on the root cause (posted in another thread), but we
need to fix ib_srp.c:srp_remove_work() as well, as I think it will have
the same issue. It will only be hit if we cannot reconnect to the
target, so it probably doesn't see a lot of use.

I'll send a new patch to you for just the ib_srp.c side.
Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/