linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] sg_ring: a ring of scatterlist arrays

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 7 Jan 2008 16:28:10 +1100
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Cc:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] sg_ring: a ring of scatterlist arrays

On Monday 07 January 2008 16:01:40 Tejun Heo wrote:
> > But we hit the same problems:
> >
> > 1) sg_chain loses information.  The clever chain packaging makes reading
> > easy, but manipulation is severely limited.  You can append to your own
> > chains by padding, but not someone elses.  This works for SCSI, but what
> > about the rest of us?  And don't even think of joining mapped chains: it
> > will almost work.
>
> You can append by allocating one more element on the chain to be
> appended and moving the last element of the first chain to it while
> using the last element for chaining.

Hi Tejun,

   Nice try!  Even ignoring the ugliness of undoing such an operation if the 
caller doesn't expect you to mangle their chains, consider a one-element sg 
array. :(

Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/