linux-kernel - Re: umount -l <path>, getcwd and /proc/<pid>/cwd inconsistent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 07 Jan 2008 09:29:53 +0100
From:	Bauke Jan Douma <bjdouma@...all.nl>
To:	Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: umount -l <path>, getcwd and /proc/<pid>/cwd inconsistent

Ian Kent wrote on 07-01-08 04:17:
> Hi all,
> 
> Could someone please help me understand what's happening with, what
> looks like inconsistent behavior, between getpwd and procfs readlink.
> 
> Basically, from a bash shell, setting working directory to a mounted
> directory all is fine with "pwd" and "/proc/<pid>/cwd". Following a
> "umount - l" on the mount "pwd" continues to return the expected string
> but "/proc/<pid>/cwd" returns an empty string.
> 
> What I'm really after is why this happens because sys_getcwd and
> proc_pid_readlink appear to do essentially the same thing to get the
> string.
> 
[snip]

What does `/bin/pwd' return, when you do that instead of
plain `pwd' (after the umount)?

bjd


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/