linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Claim maintainership for block2mtd and update email addresses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 9 Jan 2008 00:23:24 +0100 (CET)
From:	Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
To:	Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Claim maintainership for block2mtd and update email
 addresses

On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Jörn Engel wrote:

> I'm happy if people spend effort and make unicode work.  Until then I'll
> semi-officially change my name to "Joern" and keep collecting unusual
> specimens.

Just wondering - nothing personal at all. What's the official plan for 
this - do we want (when utf8 works) to use utf8 codes for symbols only for 
languages mostly based on ASCII, like iso-8859-15, or for all? Would we, 
for example, then also write Cyrillic names in utf-8 and every other 
alphabet for that matter? Didn't find anything under Documentation about 
that. Maybe we want to document it somewhere? Wasn't C-sources originally 
supposed to be ASCII? So, what we use in sources, what under Documentation 
or in MAINTAINERS may be different matters?

Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/