linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.24-rc7, intel audio: alsa doesn't say a beep

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:04:20 +0100
From:	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To:	Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net>
Cc:	Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@...nline.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc7, intel audio: alsa doesn't say a beep

At Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:11:20 -0500,
Daniel Hazelton wrote:
> 
> On Saturday 12 January 2008 04:41:21 Harald Dunkel wrote:
> > Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > At Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:02:53 +0100,
> > >
> > > Harald Dunkel wrote:
> > >> Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > >>> Hm...  Just to be sure, try the patch below.  It's a clean up patch
> > >>> that I'd like to apply later.
> > >>
> > >> Sorry, no sound.
> > >
> > > OK, but I'd like to know whether this makes no regression to rc6.
> > > Could you check?
> > >
> > > Also, what exactly did you test?  "No sound" means that no sound from
> > > the headphone / line-out or from the speaker?
> > >
> > > One interesting test would be to increase the value of udelay() in the
> > > reverted patch.  What happens if it's set to 500?
> >
> > There is no udelay() in the reverted patch. If I replace "udelay(10)"
> > by "udelay(500)" in the original rc7, then there is still no sound.
> >
> > This is like fishing in the dark. We've got a working version. Why not
> > keep it?
> >
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Harri
> 
> Could this have anything to do with the following messages I've seen when 
> trying -rc7 ?
> 
> [    7.760269] pnpacpi: exceeded the max number of mem resources: 12

Judging from Harald's report, it looks like a different problem.
The buggy patch (regarding HDA-intel) was, at least, already reverted
on Linus git tree.  Could you give it a try?


Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/