linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/10] x86: Change NR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:08:38 -0800
From:	Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	mingo@...e.hu, Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
	Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] x86: Change NR_CPUS arrays in topology

Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Jan 13 2008 10:34, travis@....com wrote:
>> +++ b/include/asm-x86/cpu.h
>> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
>> #include <linux/nodemask.h>
>> #include <linux/percpu.h>
>>
>> -struct i386_cpu {
>> +struct x86_cpu {
>> 	struct cpu cpu;
>> };
>> extern int arch_register_cpu(int num);
> 
> Is not struct x86_cpu kinda redundant here if it only wraps around
> one member?

Looking at it, I think the x86 arch specific include file
is including the generic struct cpu (instead of say, a
different one)...?

Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/