linux-kernel - Re: regression: 100% io-wait with 2.6.24-rcX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:42:13 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Fengguang Wu <wfg@...l.ustc.edu.cn>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, jplatte@...sa.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: regression: 100% io-wait with 2.6.24-rcX


* Fengguang Wu <wfg@...l.ustc.edu.cn> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 12:41:26PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 12:30 +0100, Joerg Platte wrote:
> > > Am Montag, 14. Januar 2008 schrieb Fengguang Wu:
> > > 
> > > > Joerg, this patch fixed the bug for me :-)
> > > 
> > > Fengguang, congratulations, I can confirm that your patch fixed the bug! With 
> > > previous kernels the bug showed up after each reboot. Now, when booting the 
> > > patched kernel everything is fine and there is no longer any suspicious 
> > > iowait!
> > > 
> > > Do you have an idea why this problem appeared in 2.6.24? Did somebody change 
> > > the ext2 code or is it related to the changes in the scheduler?
> > 
> > It was Fengguang who changed the inode writeback code, and I guess the
> > new and improved code was less able do deal with these funny corner
> > cases. But he has been very good in tracking them down and solving them,
> > kudos to him for that work!
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> In particular the bug is triggered by the patch named:
>         "writeback: introduce writeback_control.more_io to indicate more io"
> That patch means to speed up writeback, but unfortunately its
> aggressiveness has disclosed bugs in reiserfs, jfs and now ext2.
> 
> Linus, given the number of bugs it triggered, I'd recommend revert 
> this patch(git commit 2e6883bdf49abd0e7f0d9b6297fc3be7ebb2250b). Let's 
> push it back to -mm tree for more testings?

i dont think a revert at this stage is a good idea and i'm not sure 
pushing it back into -mm would really expose more of these bugs. And 
these are real bugs in filesystems - bugs which we want to see fixed 
anyway. You are also tracking down those bugs very fast.

[ perhaps, if it's possible technically (and if it is clean enough), you
  might want to offer a runtime debug tunable that can be used to switch
  off the new aspects of your code. That would speed up testing, in case
  anyone suspects the new writeback code. ]

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/