linux-kernel - Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:07:14 +0100
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	David Chinner <dgc@....com>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
	Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>,
	Valerie Henson <val.henson@...il.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incremental
	fsck)

Hi!

> > > > What are ext3 expectations of disk (is there doc somewhere)? For
> > > > example... if disk does not lie, but powerfail during write damages
> > > > the sector -- is ext3 still going to work properly?
> > > 
> > > Nope. However the few disks that did this rapidly got firmware updates
> > > because there are other OS's that can't cope.
> > > 
> > > > If disk does not lie, but powerfail during write may cause random
> > > > numbers to be returned on read -- can fsck handle that?
> > > 
> > > most of the time. and fsck knows about writing sectors to remove read
> > > errors in metadata blocks.
> > > 
> > > > What abou disk that kills 5 sectors around sector being written during
> > > > powerfail; can ext3 survive that?
> > > 
> > > generally. Note btw that for added fun there is nothing that guarantees
> > > the blocks around a block on the media are sequentially numbered. The
> > > usually are but you never know.
> > 
> > Ok, should something like this be added to the documentation?
> > 
> > It would be cool to be able to include few examples (modern SATA disks
> > support bariers so are safe, any IDE from 1989 is unsafe), but I do
> > not know enough about hw...
> 
> ext3 is not the only filesystem that will have trouble due to
> volatile write caches. We see problems often enough with XFS
> due to volatile write caches that it's in our FAQ:
> 
> http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/faq.html#wcache

Nice FAQ, yep. Perhaps you should move parts of it to Documentation/ ,
and I could then make ext3 FAQ point to it?

I had write cache enabled on my main computer. Oops. I guess that
means we do need better documentation.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/