| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:32:54 -0800 From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net> To: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@...ell.com> Cc: "Roman Zippel" <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>, "lkml" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@...otime.net> Subject: Re: 2.6.23-git Kconfig regression On Thursday 17 January 2008, Jan Beulich wrote: > >This stuff isn't for "distro" kernels; it's for embedded > >environments of the "only this hardware exists" sort. > >Space matters, and having small code matters. Nobody has > >been interested enough in an "embedded distro" model to > >provide patches enabling such stuff. > > Why not make the whole thing depend on EMBEDDED then? Because while its design center is small systems, there's actually no technical dependency there. The Kconfig for EMBEDDED also says it's for disabling or tweaking standard settings ... ergo, not *adding* subsystems or drivers. Oddly enough, most things that work on small systems can also be used on bigger ones. :) - Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists