linux-kernel - Re: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and bug fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:57:07 -0800 (PST)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andreas Herrmann3 <andreas.herrmann3@....com>,
	Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>, ak@....de,
	ebiederm@...ssion.com, rdreier@...co.com, gregkh@...e.de,
	airlied@...net.ie, davej@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, arjan@...radead.org,
	jesse.barnes@...el.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com
Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and bug
 fixes



On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > >   swapper:1 conflicting cache attribute c0403000-c0404000 uncached<->default
> > >   ACPI: PCI interrupt for device 0000:00:12.0 disabled
> 
> The correct behaviour probably would be to go with the most restrictive
> caching behaviour, i.e. uncached in this case.

Well, the sad part is that in this case, uncached is the SAME THING as 
default. 

So it's not like there is any actual real conflict, other than in a PAT 
confusion thing.

			Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/