linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Allocate pnp resources dynamically via krealloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 20 Jan 2008 02:23:13 +0200
From:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	trenn@...e.de
Cc:	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, "Len Brown" <lenb@...nel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bjorn.helgaas@...com>,
	"Rene Herman" <rene.herman@...access.nl>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allocate pnp resources dynamically via krealloc

Hi Thomas,

On Jan 19, 2008 10:00 PM, Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de> wrote:
> +static int pnp_alloc_port(struct pnp_resource_table *res)
> +{

[snip]

> +       res->port_resource = krealloc(res->port_resource,
> +             (sizeof(struct resource) * res->allocated_ports)
> +             + (sizeof(struct resource) * PNP_ALLOC_PORT), GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> +       if (!res->port_resource)
> +               return -ENOMEM;

When krealloc() returns NULL, there wasn't enough memory to fit the
new size but the original memory region remains unchanged. Therefore
you must not unconditionally overwrite the res->port_resource with the
return value of krealloc(); otherwise you might leak memory.

                Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/