linux-kernel - [HELP]Problem with exit(0) and

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:40:21 +0800
From:	"Li Xiaodong" <lixd@...fujitsu.com>
To:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [HELP]Problem with exit(0) and _exit(0) on RHEL x86


I thought the effects of exit(0) and _exit(0) should be different.

----
int main(void)
{
        int var = 0;
        pid_t pid;

        printf("before vfork\n");
        if ( (pid = vfork()) < 0 )
                printf("error\n");
        else if ( pid == 0 )
        {
                var++;
                exit(0);  /* Clear parent's IO */
        }

        printf("%d\n",var);
        return 0;
}

----

int main(void)
{
        int var = 0;
        pid_t pid;

        printf("before vfork\n");
        if ( (pid = vfork()) < 0 )
                printf("error\n");
        else if ( pid == 0 )
        {
                var++;
                _exit(0);  /* Do not clear parent's IO */
        }

        printf("%d\n",var);
        return 0;
}

----

But the actual results on RHEL5 x86 were beyond my ken. The outputs of the
above two are the same. 

$./a.out
before vfork
1

Could anyone help me with this? Thanks.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/