| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:23:59 +0100 From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> To: Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@...p.net.lb> CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc7 to 2.6.24-rc8 possible regression Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote: > No, i am using vanilla kernel. It is one of production machines, and as i > know screen is not using epoll. OK, but the trace shows that it is the epoll recursion again. > I will try to apply on all my production machines this patch. Sorry if it is > related. Well, let's hope that the lockdep annotation or whatever other fix gets into mainline sooner than later. Which reminds me to test my setup again which appeared to be able to reproduce the __wake_up recursion on my command... -- Stefan Richter -=====-==--- ---= =-==- http://arcgraph.de/sr/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists