lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:32:34 +0300
From:	Anton Salikhmetov <salikhmetov@...il.com>
To:	linux-mm@...ck.org, jakob@...hought.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, valdis.kletnieks@...edu,
	riel@...hat.com, ksm@...dk, staubach@...hat.com,
	jesper.juhl@...il.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	protasnb@...il.com, miklos@...redi.hu, r.e.wolff@...wizard.nl,
	hidave.darkstar@...il.com, hch@...radead.org
Subject: [PATCH -v7 0/2] Fixing the issue with memory-mapped file times

This is the seventh version of my solution for the bug #2645:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645

Since the previous version, the following has changed: based on
Linus' comment, SMP-safe PTE update implemented.

Discussions, which followed my past submissions, showed that it was
tempting to approach this problem using very different assumptions.
However, many such designs have proved to be incomplete or inefficient.

Taking into account the obvious complexity of this problem, I prepared a
design document, the purpose of which is twofold. First, it summarizes
previous attempts to resolve the ctime/mtime issue. Second, it attempts
to prove that what the patches do is necessary and sufficient for mtime
and ctime update provided that we start from a certain sane set of
requirements. The design document is available via the following link:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645#c40

For the seventh version, comprehensive performance testing was performed.
The results of performance tests, including numbers, are available here:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645#c43
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ