linux-kernel - Re: Is try_module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:34:57 +0800
From:	rmingming <mingming.nk@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is try_module_get buggy?

> Hi rminming,
>
> try_module_get is designed to ensure that you don't call a function inside a
> module without a reference.  Like any reference function, it cannot handle
> the case where the argument is invalid (or invalidated partway through the
> call).
>
> In this case, the module pointer is usually inside a registered structure.
> The pointer will be valid until the structure is unregistered, which the
> calling code presumably prevents while it's doing a lookup.
>
> Hope that clarifies,
> Rusty.
>

Hi Rusty,

Thank you so much!
I think you mean that this situation can really happen, because this
is a reference function, but it is so seldom, and the common result of
this situation is a kernel oops, it's not very important. Am I right?

Sorry about later reply, thanks again.
Best wishes,

rmingming
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/