linux-kernel - Re: CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:00:33 -0500
From:	fche@...hat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler)
To:	mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: CONFIG_MARKERS


Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com> writes:

> I notice in module.c:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MARKERS
> 	if (!mod->taints)
> 		marker_update_probe_range(mod->markers,
> 			mod->markers + mod->num_markers, NULL, NULL);
> #endif
>
> Is this an attempt to not set a marker for proprietary modules? [...]

I can't seem to find any discussion about this aspect.  If this is the
intent, it seems misguided to me.  There may instead be a relationship
to TAINT_FORCED_{RMMOD,MODULE}.  Mathieu?

- FChE
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/