Both of these references to cpu_to_node() can potentially occur before the "late" cpu_to_node map is setup. Therefore, they should be changed to use early_cpu_to_node(). Signed-off-by: Mike Travis --- arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ void __init numa_init_array(void) rr = first_node(node_online_map); for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++) { - if (cpu_to_node(i) != NUMA_NO_NODE) + if (early_cpu_to_node(i) != NUMA_NO_NODE) continue; numa_set_node(i, rr); rr = next_node(rr, node_online_map); @@ -528,7 +528,8 @@ void __init numa_initmem_init(unsigned l __cpuinit void numa_add_cpu(int cpu) { - set_bit(cpu, (unsigned long *)&node_to_cpumask_map[cpu_to_node(cpu)]); + set_bit(cpu, + (unsigned long *)&node_to_cpumask_map[early_cpu_to_node(cpu)]); } void __cpuinit numa_set_node(int cpu, int node) -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/