linux-kernel - [PATCH 128/196] Kobject: the cris iop_fw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:32:37 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Mikael Starvik <starvik@...s.com>,
	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Subject: [PATCH 128/196] Kobject: the cris iop_fw_load.c code is broken

This code is really really really broken.  So much so that it's almost
impossible to fix with a simple patch, so just comment out the offending
registration with the kobject core, and mark the driver as broken.

The problem is that the code is trying to register a "raw" struct
device, which is not allowed.  struct device is only for use within the
driver model.  This is being done to try to use the firmware layer which
wants a struct device.  To properly fix this, use something easy, like a
platform device, which is a struct device and can be used for this kind
of thing.

Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@...s.com>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
 arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/iop_fw_load.c |   11 +++++++++++
 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/iop_fw_load.c b/arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/iop_fw_load.c
index 11f9895..f4bdc1d 100644
--- a/arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/iop_fw_load.c
+++ b/arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/iop_fw_load.c
@@ -20,6 +20,9 @@
 
 #define IOP_TIMEOUT 100
 
+#error "This driver is broken with regard to its driver core usage."
+#error "Please contact <greg@...ah.com> for details on how to fix it properly."
+
 static struct device iop_spu_device[2] = {
 	{ .bus_id =     "iop-spu0", },
 	{ .bus_id =     "iop-spu1", },
@@ -192,6 +195,13 @@ int iop_start_mpu(unsigned int start_addr)
 
 static int __init iop_fw_load_init(void)
 {
+#if 0
+	/*
+	 * static struct devices can not be added directly to sysfs by ignoring
+	 * the driver model infrastructure.  To fix this properly, please use
+	 * the platform_bus to register these devices to be able to properly
+	 * use the firmware infrastructure.
+	 */
 	device_initialize(&iop_spu_device[0]);
 	kobject_set_name(&iop_spu_device[0].kobj, "iop-spu0");
 	kobject_add(&iop_spu_device[0].kobj);
@@ -201,6 +211,7 @@ static int __init iop_fw_load_init(void)
 	device_initialize(&iop_mpu_device);
 	kobject_set_name(&iop_mpu_device.kobj, "iop-mpu");
 	kobject_add(&iop_mpu_device.kobj);
+#endif
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.5.3.8

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/