linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 012/196] nozomi driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 25 Jan 2008 12:02:22 -0500
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
Cc:	Frank Seidel <fseidel@...e.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>,
	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 012/196] nozomi driver

On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:21:33 +0100, Jan Engelhardt said:
> 
> On Jan 25 2008 13:44, Frank Seidel wrote:
> >> >+/*
> >> >+ * CHANGELOG
> >> 
> >> Changelogs go into git, not files, at least that is what was mentioned
> >> time and again.
> >
> >i removed them
> >
> If you want to keep them, add it to the patch description; that way they will
> be retained in "git log" without expanding the size of the .c file. :)

By all means - if you have text that explains the who/what/why of the patch,
put it in the patch description, so that 6 months later idiots like me have
a fighting chance of figuring out whether the patch incorrectly implements
the right idea, or if it correctly implements the wrong idea. ;)

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped