linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] xtime_lock vs update_process

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 28 Jan 2008 13:29:33 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	rth@...ddle.net, bryan.wu@...log.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
	gerg@...inux.org, lethal@...ux-sh.org, wli@...omorphy.com,
	davem@...emloft.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] xtime_lock vs update_process_times


On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 12:20 +0000, Russell King wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:39:55AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > move update_process_times() out from under xtime_lock.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> 
> Peter,
> 
> Mind if I merge:
> 
> >  arch/arm/common/time-acorn.c          |    2 --
> >  arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam926x_time.c |    3 ---
> >  arch/arm/plat-iop/time.c              |    4 ----
> >  arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/time.c          |    2 --
> 
> with my patch and submit it as part of the ARM merge (which I'm hoping
> to send in about an hours time.)

not at all, please do :-)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/