| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 13:45:54 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> To: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Problem with ata layer in 2.6.24 * Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se> wrote: > Peter Zijlstra writes: > > > > On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 09:17 +0100, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > > > > > 1. Wrong mailing list; use linux-ide (@vger) instead. > > > > What, and keep all us other interested people in the dark? > > MAINTAINERS clearly lists linux-ide as the primary mailing list for > all things IDE/ATA. > > The original report only went to LKML, thus it has a high chance of > being missed or ignored by those most capable of dealing with it. that is a fatal misunderstanding on your part. lkml is a perfectly fine place to report Linux bugs, why should testers be aware of the zillions of tiny, mostly irrelevant lists mentioned in the MAINTAINERS file? Maintainers are required to read lkml for bugreports regarding their subsystems - not the other way around. If a tester manages to Cc: a maintainer (be that a person or a list alias) that's a bonus, but not a requirement at all ... Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists