linux-kernel - Re: [CPUISOL] CPU isolation extensions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 28 Jan 2008 08:59:10 -0600
From:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	maxk@...lcomm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
	srostedt@...hat.com, ghaskins@...ell.com
Subject: Re: [CPUISOL] CPU isolation extensions

Thanks for the CC, Peter.

  Ingo - see question at end of message.

Max wrote:
> We've had scheduler support for CPU isolation ever since O(1) scheduler went it. 
> I'd like to extend it further to avoid kernel activity on those CPUs as much as possible.

I recently added the per-cpuset flag 'sched_load_balance' for some
other realtime folks, so that they can disable the kernel scheduler
load balancing on isolated CPUs.  It essentially allows for dynamic
control of which CPUs are isolated by the scheduler, using the cpuset
hierarchy, rather than enhancing the 'isolated_cpus' mask.   That
'isolated_cpus' mask remained a minimal kernel boottime parameter.
I believe this went to Linus's tree about Oct 2007.

It looks like you have three additional tweaks for realtime in this
patch set, with your patches:

  [PATCH] [CPUISOL] Do not route IRQs to the CPUs isolated at boot
  [PATCH] [CPUISOL] Support for workqueue isolation
  [PATCH] [CPUISOL] Isolated CPUs should be ignored by the "stop machine"

It would be interesting to see a patchset with the above three realtime
tweaks, layered on this new cpuset 'sched_load_balance' apparatus, rather
than layered on changes to make 'isolated_cpus' more dynamic.  Some of us
run realtime and cpuset-intensive loads on the same system, so like to
have those two capabilities co-operate with each other.

Ingo - what's your sense of the value of the above three realtime tweaks
       (the last three patches in Max's patch set)?

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/