linux-kernel - Re: [patch 6/6] mm: bdi: allow setting a maximum for the bdi dirty limit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:17:47 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [patch 6/6] mm: bdi: allow setting a maximum for the bdi dirty
	limit


On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 10:46 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:49:06 +0100
> > Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
> > 
> > > Add "max_ratio" to /sys/class/bdi.  This indicates the maximum
> > > percentage of the global dirty threshold allocated to this bdi.
> > 
> > Maybe I'm having a stupid day, but I don't understand the semantics of this
> > min and max at all.  I've read the code, and I've read the comments (well,
> > I've hunted for some) and I've read the docs.
> > 
> > I really don't know how anyone could use this in its current state without
> > doing a lot of code-reading and complex experimentation.  All of which
> > would be unneeded if this tunable was properly documented.
> > 
> > So.  Please provide adequate documentation for this tunable.  I'd suggest
> > that it be pitched at the level of a reasonably competent system operator. 
> > It should help them understand why the tunable exists, why they might
> > choose to alter it, and what effects they can expect to see.  Hopefully a
> > reaonably competent kernel developer can then understand it too.
> 
> OK.  I think what's missing from some docs, is a high level
> description of the per-bdi throttling algorithm, and how it affects
> writeback.  Because with info, I think the min and max ratios are
> trivially understandable: they just override the result of the
> algorithm, in case it would mean too high or too low threshold.
> 
> Peter, could you write something about that?

Sure.

How about something like:

Under normal circumstances each device is given a part of the total
write-back cache that relates to its current avg writeout speed in
relation to the other devices.

min_ratio - allows one to assign a minimum portion of the write-back
cache to a particular device. This is useful in situations where you
might want to provide a minimum QoS. (One request for this feature came
from flash based storage people who wanted to avoid writing out at all
costs - they of course needed some pdflush hacks as well)

max_ratio - allows one to assign a maximum portion of the dirty limit to
a particular device. This is useful in situations where you want to
avoid one device taking all or most of the write-back cache. Eg. an NFS
mount that is prone to get stuck, or a FUSE mount which you don't trust
to play fair.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/