lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:33:29 +1030
From:	David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>
To:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
CC:	Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
	sfrench@...ba.org, samba-technical@...ts.samba.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] remove smbfs

Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Jan 30 2008 12:53, Steve French wrote:
>   
>> I have mounted to Windows98 a few months ago with no problems (other
>> than a few restrictions like you can't set the file times via utimes).
>> For mounts to Windows98 note that you have to specify the server
>> netbios name on the mount (since it is not the same as the DNS name).
>> In your example your would need to specify "servernetbiosname=WIN98"
>> in the mount options (until mount.cifs autoretries with
>> servernetbiosname assumed to be the beginning of the UNC name - note
>> that later servers have a dummy netbios name that is used so this
>> mount option is only needed for OS/2 and Win9x).
>>     
>
> Ok that works. I had tried "netbiosname" but not "servernetbiosname"
> (only fuzzy memories from the last win98 encounter and the suggestion
> to use netbiossomething).
>   

Apparently CIFS lacks an adequate man page (otherwise Jan would have
discovered servernetbiosname for himself.)  That's sufficient reason to
keep smbfs, and just to be radical, why not remove cifs until it's
properly documented?  Man pages are essential.

(Listens for howls.)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ