[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2008 03:49:01 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>,
Eduardo Pereira Habkost <ehabkost@...hat.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>,
H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6 of 7] x86: move pud/pgd functions into common asm/pgalloc.h
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> yes but the early hang is very real so either my hardware is stubbornly
> ignoring that your patch is pure code movement (in which case i'll have
> to have a word or two with my hardware), or your patch is perhaps wrong
> somewhere ;-)
>
I see what it is. set_pud on 32-bit needs only _PAGE_PRESENT, but for
64-bit it needs _PAGE_TABLE.
> generally you can protect yourself against full reverts by separating
> the NOP changes from the non-NOP changes. If a change is small enough i
> might spot the bug immediately and fix it - otherwise i have to undo
> your whole series to keep the x86.git ball rolling. I thought we went
> through this excercise a few times already :-/ ...
>
This one was supposed to be pure motion, but my eyeball diff failed me.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists