[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 19:00:02 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] sleepy linux self-test
* David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net> wrote:
> > > Plus, the way you're doing it now is violating the locking
> > > protocol used by that driver.
> >
> > Yep, you are right, but that is the easy issue to fix.
>
> Which is why I was puzzled that you didn't start out doing it the
> "right" way ... even just hard-wiring the dubious assumption that
> "rtc0" is the right RTC to use. :)
because this was mostly about an quick & easy hack to see whether it
makes sense at all to automate the testing of suspend/resume. (People
who want to use RTC functionality might not have the desire to get into
extending it straight away - they just want something rather obvious
done and that's it.)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists