| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 18:17:22 +0000 From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "Andrew G. Morgan" <morgan@...nel.org>, Linux Security Modules List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] per-process securebits On Fri 2008-02-01 20:07:01, James Morris wrote: > On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Really? I'd feel a lot more comfortable if yesterday's version 1 had led > > to a stream of comments from suitably-knowledgeable kernel developers which > > indicated that those developers had scrutinised this code from every > > conceivable angle and had declared themselves 100% happy with it. > > FWIW, I've reviewed the patch in detail a couple of times, and don't see > any issues with it that haven't already been raised by Serge. > > You can add my reviewed-by. > > I think it does need more eyes, and some time baking in -mm. I don't thing -mm baking helps here. People playing with -mm are not the ones trying to hack your box. -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists