linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] x86 updates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 05 Feb 2008 13:42:02 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] x86 updates

Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> Well, the real question is "what are the defaults"
> 

Well, I guess my point was that we shouldn't rely on the defaults.

>> By default:
>>
>> .bss 	is (aw,nobits).
>> .data 	is (aw,progbits).
>> .rodata	is (a,progbits).
>> .text	is (ax,progbits).
> 
> But what about something like ".init.data"?
> 
> I'd assume the defaults for unrecognized segments would have to be 
> something sane like (aw,progbits) (ie my patch shouldn't make any 
> difference), but where do we find that out?

The defaults are undocumented, and thus could change from one binutils 
version to another.  Experimentally, with 
binutils-2.17.50.0.18-1.x86_64, a section named ".init.data" get 
("",@progbits) as the default attributes.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/