linux-kernel - Re: [2.6.24 regression][BUGFIX] numactl --interleave=all doesn't works on memoryless node.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 5 Feb 2008 16:15:19 -0600
From:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To:	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
Cc:	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, clameter@....com, rientjes@...gle.com,
	mel@....ul.ie, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, eric.whitney@...com
Subject: Re: [2.6.24 regression][BUGFIX] numactl --interleave=all doesn't
 works on memoryless node.

Lee wrote:
> [PATCH] 2.6.24-mm1 - mempolicy:  silently restrict to allowed nodes

At first glance, I like it.  Thanks.

The changes in the exact behaviour of set_mempolicy (and mbind?) seem
to me to be changes for the better -- subtle improvements in the
consistency of handling corner cases.

However I don't have code that depends all that elaborately on the
fine details of these system calls, so I'm easy.  If others know of
an existing or likely usage pattern that this patch would break,
that would be interesting input.

Thanks, Lee.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/