linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] 2.6.24 refuses to boot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 04 Feb 2008 23:44:04 -0500
From:	Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com>
To:	Mark Lord <liml@....ca>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
	Chris Rankin <rankincj@...oo.com>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.24 refuses to boot - ATA problem?

On Monday 04 February 2008, Mark Lord wrote:
>Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Sunday 03 February 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> * Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com> wrote:
>>>> I believe its the same, but lemme paste it for sure, yes:
>>>> [   26.339926] ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs
>>>> [   26.340119] ..TIMER: vector=0x31 apic1=0 pin1=0 apic2=-1 pin2=-1
>>>> [   26.350129] ..MP-BIOS bug: 8254 timer not connected to IO-APIC
>>>> [   26.350182] ...trying to set up timer (IRQ0) through the 8259A ...
>>>> failed. [   26.350185] ...trying to set up timer as Virtual Wire IRQ...
>>>> failed. [   26.360186] ...trying to set up timer as ExtINT IRQ... works.
>>>>
>>>> The third line is the only line that makes it to the screen during the
>>>> boot trace.
>>>>
>>>> Now, what does this tell us?
>>>
>>> the question would be:
>>>
>>> - if you remove the acpi_use_timer_override boot flag
>>> - and if you boot a kernel with this hack applied
>>>
>>> => do those weird PATA failures come back?
>>>
>>> If the failues do _not_ come back then the problem is somehow
>>> affected/worked-around by the IO-APIC code that generates the above 4
>>> lines. If the failures are still the same then the above 4 lines are
>>> really just an uninteresting side-effect of the acpi_use_timer_override
>>> flag - and the real side-effects (that fixes PATA on your box) are to be
>>> found elsewhere.
>>>
>>> Sadly, the latter variant is the expected answer.
>>>
>>> 	Ingo
>>
>> And at this point, I can't tell.  This reboot was from a cold start,
>> without the argument, and cold by long enough to make the rounds about the
>> house and pick up a beer, but not take my evening pillbox.  A minute cold,
>> maybe 2 max. The log is clean since except for a kudzu nag of some sort:
>
>..
>
>Just to muddy your observations:  it is quite possible that a cold
> (power-off) reboot may be required to properly observe what happens here.
>
Precisely why I've now done that twice, without using the extra argument.  No 
recurrence dammit.

>Cheers



-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man.
		-- Dr. Johnson
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/