linux-kernel - Re: cpuisol: CPU isolation extensions (take 2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 06 Feb 2008 07:29:23 -0500
From:	Mark Hounschell <dmarkh@....rr.com>
To:	Max Krasnyanskiy <maxk@...lcomm.com>
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	mingo@...e.hu, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>, Mark Hounschell <markh@...pro.net>
Subject: Re: cpuisol: CPU isolation extensions (take 2)

Max Krasnyanskiy wrote:

> With CPU isolation
> it's very easy to achieve single digit usec worst case and around 200
> nsec average response times on off-the-shelf
> multi- processor/core systems (vanilla kernel plus these patches) even
> under exteme system load. 

Hi Max, could you elaborate on what sort events your response times are
from?

Regards
Mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/