linux-kernel - Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 6 Feb 2008 02:42:14 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines

On Wednesday, 6 of February 2008, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 5 of February 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >> This rewrites wakeup code to .c, and it fixes stack (should use movl
> >> ,%esp, not movw). Testers wanted. Makefile infrastructure was done by
> >> hpa, cleanups by rjw.
> > 
> > I'll test it tomorrow and I still have some more cleanups (I was distracted by
> > a nasty scheduler issue in the current mainline).
> 
> The asm() for making beeps really need to be moved to a function and 
> cleaned up (redone in C using inb()/outb()) if they are to be retained 
> at all.

Yes, they are.  For some people they're the only tool to debug broken resume.

Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/