linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] USB: mark USB drivers as being GPL only

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:28:10 -0800
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Christer Weinigel <christer@...nigel.se>
Cc:	David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>,
	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: mark USB drivers as being GPL only

On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 09:14:48PM +0100, Christer Weinigel wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 12:34:18 -0800
> Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> 
> > In the end, it's up to the copyright holders to enforce the license.
> > And as I have stated in the past, a number of them have made public
> > statements as to what they think about this issue.  And it corresponds
> > exactly with what Marcel has stated above.
> > 
> > So if you wish to violate the copyright of others, you take the risk
> > that you might be caught and punished, something that you and your
> > legal council needs to take into account.
> 
> So when do you sue Nvidia, ATI, Atheros, Broadcom[1],
> M-Systems/Sandisk[2] or Nokia? All those companies distribute binary
> drivers for Linux without providing source code?

How do you know that such legal action isn't already happening?

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/