linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] LED updates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 8 Feb 2008 09:20:40 -0200
From:	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
To:	Németh Márton <nm127@...email.hu>
Cc:	Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] LED updates

On Fri, 08 Feb 2008, Németh Márton wrote:
> Richard Purdie wrote:
> >>>       leds: Add support for hardware accelerated LED flashing
> >> This one has a loose end: when you call brightness_set on a led with
> >> hardware flash acceleration, you will leave the trigger armed, BUT the led
> >> won't blink anymore.  That's just wrong.
> > 
> > Agreed.
> 
> My only question is that do you know any LED hardware which can blink _and_
> can set the brightness independently? If there would be such a LED I could

Several, but none on laptops or other stuff that runs Linux.  That behaviour
is not common on indicator LEDs.  I have seen standby LEDs on laptops which
"blink" by slowly fading from full to off, and then back to full, though.

> imagine that the brightness can be changed while the LED remains blinking at
> some low frequency. For example a simple LED with brightness set possibility and
> blinking directed by software is an example where the blinking and the brightness
> setting are completely independent.

Sure, it is perfectly possible.  I am not sure it is *desireable*, though.
The way we have triggers work make what you describe impossible right now,
the software triggers are LED_OFF:LED_FULL, not LED_OFF:old-brightness.

And so are the common hardware triggers on laptops, for that matter.

If we go and fix every trigger to use the current brightness (as long as it
is non-zero) as the "turn LED on" trigger event, then the documentation has
to be changed accordingly to do what you said above, and we would stop the
trigger only by setting brightness to zero or by explicitly removing it.

I don't think it is worth the hassle, though.  But we better decide that
*now*, because all this changing of the LED class ABI (even if it is, IMHO,
a big improvement) is not a good idea.  We better do it all during the
2.6.25 cycle.

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/