linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1] Mempolicy: silently restrict nodemask to allowed nodes V3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 10 Feb 2008 03:11:22 +0900
From:	"KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	"Lee Schermerhorn" <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Christoph Lameter" <clameter@....com>,
	"Paul Jackson" <pj@....com>,
	"David Rientjes" <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	"Mel Gorman" <mel@....ul.ie>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, "Eric Whitney" <eric.whitney@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1] Mempolicy: silently restrict nodemask to allowed nodes V3

Hi Lee-san

looks good for me.
I'll test about the head of week and report it by another mail.

Thanks!

> Was "Re: [2.6.24 regression][BUGFIX] numactl --interleave=all doesn't
> works on memoryless node."
>
> [Aside:  I noticed there were two slightly different distributions for
> this topic.  I've unified the distribution lists w/o dropping anyone, I
> think.  Apologies if you'd rather have been dropped...]
>
> Here's V3 of the patch, accomodating Kosaki Motohiro's suggestion for
> folding contextualize_policy() into mpol_check_policy() [because my
> "was_empty" argument "was ugly" ;-)].  It does seem to clean up the
> code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/