lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 09 Feb 2008 10:29:02 +0100
From:	Michael Opdenacker <michael-lists@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Simon Holm Thøgersen <odie@...aau.dk>
CC:	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux-tiny@...enic.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 (Linux Tiny): configure out support for some	processors

On 02/09/2008 09:30 AM, Simon Holm Thøgersen wrote:
> The build of my currently running kernel for my laptop has
> $ size -t amd.o cyrix.o centaur.o transmeta.o intel.o nexgen.o umc.o
>    text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
>    2809	    316	      0	   3125	    c35	amd.o
>    2387	    856	      0	   3243	    cab	cyrix.o
>    1514	    312	      0	   1826	    722	centaur.o
>    1279	    312	      0	   1591	    637	transmeta.o
>    1783	    316	      0	   2099	    833	intel.o
>     126	    312	      0	    438	    1b6	nexgen.o
>      41	    312	      0	    353	    161	umc.o
>    9939	   2736	      0	  12675	   3183	(TOTALS)
>
> That is without optimize for size compilation, with that set I get
> $ size -t amd.o cyrix.o centaur.o transmeta.o intel.o nexgen.o umc.o
>    text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
>    2300	    316	      0	   2616	    a38	amd.o
>    2132	    820	      0	   2952	    b88	cyrix.o
>    1325	    312	      0	   1637	    665	centaur.o
>    1151	    312	      0	   1463	    5b7	transmeta.o
>    1575	    316	      0	   1891	    763	intel.o
>     107	    312	      0	    419	    1a3	nexgen.o
>      41	    312	      0	    353	    161	umc.o
>    8631	   2700	      0	  11331	   2c43	(TOTALS)
>
> I don't think the code changes in the patch do much with respect to
> size.
>   
Thanks for this report. Don't you think it's still useful to save up to
12 K of code that you don't use if you just have an Intel processor (for
example)?

Cheers,

Michael.

-- 
Michael Opdenacker, Free Electrons
Free Embedded Linux Training Materials
on http://free-electrons.com/training
(More than 1500 pages!)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ