lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:07:24 -0800 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>, Paul Jackson <pj@....com>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Eric Whitney <eric.whitney@...com> Subject: Re: [PATCH for 2.6.24][regression fix] Mempolicy: silently restrict nodemask to allowed nodes V3 On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:30:22 +0900 KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote: > Hi Andrew > > # this is second post of the same patch. > > this is backport from -mm to mainline. > original patch is http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120250000001182&w=2 > > my change is only line number change and remove extra space. This is identical to what I have now. > please ack. As it's now post -rc1 and not a 100% obvious thing, I tend to hang onto such patches for a week or so before sending up to Linus Should this be backported to 2.6.24.x? If so, the reasons for such a relatively stern step should be spelled out in the changelog for the -stable maintiners to evaluate. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists