linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI bug fixes for 2.6.25-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:22:51 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI bug fixes for 2.6.25-rc1

From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:11:53 -0600

> 
> On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 16:16 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > kill-warnings-in-mptbaseh-on-parisc64.patch
> 
> >   Warning fixes.
> 
> Not sure ... LSI is supposed to be processing this.

James, please don't push build warning fixes and the like back to the
driver maintainers.

This is your domain as SCSI maintainer, and you should integrate these
kinds of things directly and as promptly as possible.

This is doubly true if the "driver maintainer" can't be bothered
to ACK or fixup the patch for months.

Otherwise this kind of stuff rots, and diligent people like Andrew
(and the patch submitter, whoever that might be) get extremely
frustrated.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/