lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:41:46 -0500
From:	"Kyle Moffett" <kyle@...fetthome.net>
To:	"Linux NetDev" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Stephen Hemminger" <stephen.hemminger@...tta.com>
Subject: [RFC] Best method to control a "transmit-only" mode on fiber NICs (specifically sky2)

Hi,

The company I'm working for has an unusual fiber NIC configuration
that we use for one of our network appliances.  We connect only a
single fiber from the TX port on one NIC to the RX port on another
NIC, providing a physically-one-way path for enhanced security.
Unfortunately this doesn't work with most NIC drivers, as even with
auto-negotiation off they look for link probe pulses before they
consider the link "up" and are willing to send packets.  We have been
able to use Myricom 10GigE NICs with a custom firmware image.  More
recently we have patched the sky2 driver to turn on the FIB_FORCE_LNK
flag in the PHY control register; this seems to work on the
Marvell-chipset boards we have here.

What would be the preferred way to control this "force link" flag?
Right now we are accessing it using ethtool; we have added an
additional "duplex" mode: "DUPLEX_TXONLY", with a value of 2.  When
you specify a speed and turn off autonegotiation ("./patched-ethtool
-s eth2 speed 1000 autoneg off duplex txonly"), it will turn on the
specified bit in the PHY control register and the link will
automatically come up.  We also have one related bug-fix^Wdirty hack
for sky2 to reset the PHY a second time during netif-up after enabling
interrupts; otherwise the immediate "link up" interrupt gets lost.
Once I get approval from the company I will patch the post itself for
review.

I look forward to your comments and suggestions

Cheers,
Kyle Moffett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ