| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 04:53:25 +0100 From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl> To: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com> CC: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc2 vdso_install breaks user "make install" On 16-02-08 04:42, Roland McGrath wrote: > Perhaps it makes more sense to have vdso_install be a dependency of > modules_install rather than install, since they both put things in > /lib/modules. Would work for me -- modules_install ofcourse runs as root. > The installed vdso images are potentially useful for a kernel when you > aren't bothering to build or install any modules, but those images are > only ever useful for sophisticated debugging uses anyway. > > Sam, any thoughts? (See arch/x86/Makefile and arch/powerpc/Makefile.) Or maybe update the installkernel "protocol" to add these in? > The only kind of install runs I actually care about are for packaging > system builds. There the packaged build does 'make vdso_install' > explicitly anyway (at least Fedora rpms' .spec does). So if the > consensus is just to drop the dependency on vdso_install completely, I > don't object. Did that for now... Rene. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists