linux-kernel - Re: [dm-devel] Re: [PATCH] Implement barrier support for single device DM devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 19 Feb 2008 02:45:33 +0000
From:	Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
To:	Ric Wheeler <ric@....com>
Cc:	Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>,
	device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] Re: [PATCH] Implement barrier support for single device DM devices

On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 08:52:10AM -0500, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> I understand that. Most of the time, dm or md devices are composed of 
> uniform components which will uniformly support (or not) the cache flush 
> commands used by barriers.
 
As a dm developer, it's "almost none of the time" because trivial
configurations aren't the ones that require lots of testing effort.

Let's stop arguing over "most of the time":-)

As Andi points out, there are certainly enough real-world users of
"single linear or crypt target using one physical device" for it to be
worth our supporting it.

Alasdair
-- 
agk@...hat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/