linux-kernel - Re: modular intel-agp does not work on my box

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 23 Feb 2008 00:03:55 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>
Cc:	Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...glemail.com>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Gabriel C <crazy@...galware.org>,
	Doug Thompson <dougthompson@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: modular intel-agp does not work on my box

On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 23:19:21 -0500 Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 04:27:33AM +0100, Gabriel C wrote:
>  > Gabriel C wrote:
>  > > Dave Airlie wrote:
>  > >>> Hi,
>  > >>>
>  > >>> When building agp* modular ( CONFIG_AGP=y/m and CONFIG_AGP_INTEL=m ) intel-agp does nothing on my box 
>  > >>> ( Dell Precision WorkStation 530 MT ) chipset is not being detected.
>  > >>>
>  > >>> Building both Y fixes that and agpgart works and also detects my chipset.
>  > >> Have you got EDAC modules built as well? they might be taking ownership 
>  > >> when they shouldn't..
>  > >>
>  > > 
>  > > Yes I have EDAC built modular. I will build latest git without EDAC and agp modular
>  > > and let you know if that fixes ( workarounds ;) ) the problem.
>  > 
>  > You are right without EDAC built , agp modular does work fine. I'm on 2.6.25-rc2-00477-g1a4c6be right now.
>  > 
>  > So it is an EDAC bug ?
>  
> No, it's a failing of the pci driver model. It currently doesn't
> allow more than one driver to be bound to a single PCI device.
> For multi-function devices like bridges, this means we see problems
> like the one you mention.
> 

Well that sounds pretty bad.  What will distros do about this?

Is there something short-term-and-sleazy we can do to "fix" it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/